I’ve been wondering how much administrative processing is tied specifically to personal factors — name, profile, visa category. I’ve seen a few statistical tables, but they don’t describe the cases themselves, only numbers. You can see the logic: a nail technician with an EB-1 stuck in perpetual processing isn’t a coincidence. And if an applicant’s name literally matches the name of someone mentioned in news about military hardware, that will definitely affect the check. For those who went through long administrative processing — was there anything in your profile that might explain the delay?
I’ve seen people with name matches wait for six months — then they finally got it)
6 Likes
A lot of information about how administrative processing (AP) is structured has become available through court documents — they show several parallel tracks, and name-matching with security databases is a separate track, not directly tied to the visa profile. The senator’s office is now saying 180 days or more as the current guideline, but that’s the average case without name triggers. A colleague with dual-use publications waited 14 months with a completely clean name — so the profile works as a separate factor from the name.
6 Likes
Read the Carson Wu declaration — there a State Department employee testifies in court about how administrative processing (AP) is structured. Publications are a USCIS matter; AP is handled by the State Department — they’re orthogonal. Name-matching against databases is a separate track, not directly tied to the visa profile.
6 Likes
AP is the State Department. Name-match and visa profile are two independent tracks; they don’t intersect — I saw a case with a clean name and a 14-month wait just because of dual-use publications.
6 Likes
From real cases — there’s a pattern where the State Department calls the employer directly, clarifies details, and resolves the administrative processing (AP) within 4–5 months. Quiet waiting with no contact is a different path: there it’s held by name-matching in the databases regardless of profile. Businesses without technical publications end up there too — because of the name.
6 Likes
hmm, a call to the employer from the State Department is really a good sign — for someone in Warsaw it closed that way within a month after contact. Quiet waiting with no movement is a different scenario; there the name-match can hold for a long time. But 18 months still isn’t the end — I’ve seen cases where they approved even after that.
6 Likes
about twelve months - it’s the cutoff where the very nature of the waiting changes, it’s no longer a check but something else. I’ve seen the numbers - those who didn’t get through in a year, now many are at 15-20 months, and among them there are plenty with clean names, it’s just dual-use in publications. if both tracks fire at the same time - name-match and profile - that’s another league and honestly I don’t know how to assess it.
6 Likes
If both tracks worked - mandamus after a year, don’t wait
6 Likes