Has anyone looked at the document kit for self-filing EB-2 NIW without an attorney that’s being sold for $99 on eb2niw.com? I’m wondering whether there’s anything actually useful in it or if it’s just junk. I couldn’t find any discussions about this kit — has anyone already bought it?
When I was researching this myself, that $99 guide was one of the few that actually exist for filing an NIW (National Interest Waiver) on your own. I saw on a forum someone who assembled an EB-2 NIW case by themselves without a lawyer; in the end they sent it to an attorney for a small fee to review and assess the quality of the work — the attorney only suggested a couple of minor edits; otherwise everything was fine. As for lawyers who talk about scientific publications, awards, judging (serving on panels) and price tags of $15–20k — they’re mixing that up with EB-1A requirements; for NIW specifically that’s not required.
I filed on my own without a lawyer — these kits are basically checklists and a petition letter template. The template gives you the structure, but you still need to rewrite it for your own case — I revised my petition letter three times before I figured out how to cover all three Dhanasar points. For $99 it’s a reasonable starting point, but you won’t get a ready-made package.
It’s definitely worth getting the $99 one — at least to understand the structure and see how a petition letter is put together. I worked through the topic myself, and the hardest part is convincingly addressing the three Dhanasar points — everything hinges on the wording there. The main thing is don’t be afraid to rewrite; very few people get it perfect on the first try )
Self-filing an NIW is doable — I’ve seen cases where people managed without an attorney, but in the end I still recommend having a lawyer review it, at least a paid hour consultation for $300–400. Dhanasar’s three prongs are hard to close without fresh eyes.
99 bucks is fine. The real work starts when you’re sitting there writing the petition letter — Dhanasar’s three points aren’t a checklist, they’re the argument; my first draft was total garbage.
Also, via foia.uscis.gov you can request approved petition letters — they’re posted publicly, and looking at real approved cases was, for me personally, more useful than any template. I saw very different approaches there to the third Dhanasar prong — some had two paragraphs, some five pages, and both were approved.
FOIA approval cases - the third item: Dhanasar sorted it out there in two hours, better than any other set
It’s better to find 3–4 case studies in your specialty and work through the logic than to use a template — it’s important to understand the argumentation itself, not copy the wording word for word. You’ll also get an RFE for that.