Question about the publications criterion for EB-1A. I understand that if they want to nitpick they’ll find something. But specifically — a regional media outlet, not national, and from a different region of the country than where I’m from. How does USCIS evaluate that, and will they question why that particular outlet covered you?
About the question “why that particular outlet” — USCIS only looks at that if the article appears to be paid-for. I’ve read RFEs they routinely copy-paste about publications: they include the question “what prompted the outlet to cover you,” and it comes up when there’s no logical link between the outlet’s subject matter and the petitioner’s activities. A regional outlet being from another region by itself doesn’t automatically disqualify — what matters more is editorial coverage or “sponsored content.” Articles labeled as sponsored are discarded by attorneys from the evidentiary record even before filing.
6 Likes
My RFE for EB-1A contained a nitpick not about the regions but about the content — the officer wrote that the articles are about the work/projects, not about the petitioner himself. The wording was literally “does not establish there is a discussion of the petitioner and his/her work in the field”. Although awards and exhibitions were explicitly mentioned.
6 Likes
With articles for EB-1A you are proving two different things at once: that the article was written about you, and that the publication is major media. Regional outlets can handle the first — not the second. USCIS states literally that for major media you need “significant national or international distribution”, and it goes on to add “you would not earn acclaim at the national level from a local publication”. So the question is not even why that particular outlet ran the interview — the question is that a regional newspaper, by definition, cannot physically demonstrate national recognition. The officer phrases that in the denial.
6 Likes
Expert comments in an article and a full article about you are different things under the publication criterion. When we went over my husband’s refusal with the lawyer, they explained clearly: if you’re mentioned as one of several sources in a general industry piece — it doesn’t count. The officer is looking specifically at whether your activity is the central topic, not just a quote in someone else’s material.
6 Likes
“major media” — USCIS assesses it by audience/traffic, not by the publication’s official registration. We had publications about the O-1 in several outlets on different topics, and the officer rejected the entire criterion outright — he looked at the first article and made his decision. The lawyer explained: letters from editors saying these are professional trade publications don’t convince USCIS; they want traffic at the level of national media.
6 Likes