Can you tell me if I understand the situation correctly. While refugee status hasn’t been granted, you can’t switch to EB-2 NIW — is that right? It doesn’t matter how one entered, through Mexico or on a visa — if asylum is pending, is switching to EB-2 NIW still impossible? Or can the petition be filed while the status hasn’t yet been granted?
You can file an I-140 petition, but filing an adjustment on top of an asylum claim would create conflicting paths.
6 Likes
While refugee status hasn’t been granted, you can file an I-140, but an I-485 based on asylum won’t work anymore — they’re different paths. Am I understanding correctly?
6 Likes
There was an actual case — a person filed an I-589 and wasn’t called to an interview for a long time. They filed an I-485 based on an approved I-140 and received approval. Then it emerged that a pending asylum application blocks further action — “pending” refers to everything up to the asylum interview. The I-485 has been approved, but the process stalled after that.
6 Likes
I-140 approval doesn’t resolve the pathway conflict — it’s only the first hurdle.
6 Likes
There’s one more point that wasn’t mentioned here — for the I-485 you need to have been “inspected and admitted” or “paroled” under INA 245(a). If you entered via Mexico not through an official port of entry, that’s already a second barrier in addition to the conflict between different status pathways. USCIS explicitly states this on its website as a key requirement.
6 Likes
Leaving to “drop” a pending asylum claim and return on a regular visa — sounds logical, but it’s a trap: with a voluntary departure Form I-589 is considered withdrawn automatically, and you’d then have to return with a valid status that you won’t have at that point. I went over this with a colleague who had a similar story — her lawyer explained that this is exactly why leaving while an asylum application is pending is almost always a one-way ticket.
6 Likes
If the priority date isn’t current yet — for many people, by the time it becomes current the asylum situation has already been resolved one way or another. But if the date and the decision on the I-589 coincide in time, that’s when you have to choose; you can’t pursue both procedures on the I-485 at the same time. I’m currently watching the EB-2 date — for Russia it’s moving slowly, too.
6 Likes
If you entered the U.S. on an F-1 visa through an official port of entry, the first barrier under section 245(a) simply doesn’t arise.
6 Likes
Basically, asylum isn’t a status for I-485 purposes, which is why a conflict of paths arises.
6 Likes
An approved I-140 is only the beginning — after that everything hinges on the decision on the I-589.
6 Likes
Section 245(k) doesn’t help — it forgives status violations of up to 180 days, but a conflict between the two paths is a different story; an officer will close the Form I-485 because of a pending asylum regardless of that provision.
6 Likes